Construction contract management software covers several kinds of product that solve different problems, so the first job is to work out which problem you have. Some store documents, some handle a contract up to signature, some run a project's general workflows, and a few are built to run the contract's own processes after signature.
If you work mainly on NEC contracts, the last group is the one to look at closely, because NEC's notices and time limits need more than filing. The NEC contract management software guide goes into that in detail.
The main types compared
| Type | Good at | Usually weak at | Fits when |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared drive or document management | Storing drawings, reports and contract documents with version control | Knowing a document is a notice with a reply date | Your need is finding files |
| General contract lifecycle tool | Drafting, approvals, signature and renewal dates across a business | Change, time and payment on a construction contract after signature | You have many commercial agreements, like NDAs and supplier terms |
| Project management or field platform | RFIs, site records and general workflows across a project | A contract's own rules, unless configured for them | You want one general tool for site and design teams |
| Contract-form-specific system | Running the contract's processes with its periods and clause references | Wider project management | Most of your risk sits in contract notices and changes |
| Spreadsheets | Flexibility, low cost, small numbers of events | Dates, history, and many people working at once | A small contract with one careful owner |
These descriptions are general, and any one product may do better or worse than its category. Use the table to focus your questions, not to rule out a supplier. A configurable platform can do a lot if you build it, but ask who maintains that configuration and who checks it against the contract.
Why NEC pushes you towards a specific system
JCT and NEC ask different things of contract administration. NEC expects changes to be dealt with as they occur, and it puts time limits on both parties at each step. Having eight weeks to notify an event under 61.3 and two weeks to answer a quotation under 62.3 means dates drive the process. For the background, read the difference between JCT and NEC.
A workflow tool can route a form for approval. What needs specific knowledge is what follows from that, such as whether a silent reply can become an acceptance, which edition's clause applies, and what moves the Completion Date. If you configure a general tool for this, you become responsible for all that logic.
What Contract Status is, and isn't
Contract Status is built around NEC contracts. It has a register for each NEC process: early warnings, compensation events, quotations, instructions, programmes, payment applications, Defects, tests and inspections, and communications. It works out reply dates from the periods on the contract, and it keeps each record's history.
It records what the two sides did and when, and it doesn't decide who is right. If most of your work is on other forms, that is worth raising early on a call, because the rest of this page may point you to a different type of product.
Questions that sort the options quickly
- What share of your contracts are NEC? If it is most of them, a contract-specific tool is worth a serious look. If it is few, the cost of a separate system may not be justified.
- Where has it actually gone wrong? Missed time bars, unanswered quotations and no agreed programme suggest a process tool. Lost documents suggest document management.
- Who will use it? A tool only the commercial team opens won't capture what the site knows.
- Does the other party need access? Ask how the other side gets in and what it sees. NEC processes run between two sides, not within one company.
- Who owns the rules? Ask who keeps the clause references and periods right when your contract has Z clauses.
- How will you get data out? Records may be needed long after a project ends, so ask this before you commit.
A common mistake
Choosing the widest platform so that everything is in one place can leave the contract team with a generic form and a status field. Equally, buying a specialist tool and expecting it to replace your document system leaves you with drawings in the wrong place. Many teams use one of each, and that is fine as long as it is clear which is the record for what.
The processes themselves are worth understanding before you buy; managing NEC contracts gives a practical overview, and how to choose NEC contract software turns this into a checklist. To talk through where your contracts fit, book a call.
Related guides
- NEC Contract Management Software
- Subcontract Management Software
- NEC Software vs Spreadsheets
- How to Choose NEC Contract Software
- NEC3 Contract Software
- Contract Administration Software for Construction
See how this works in practice
Click through Contract Status with sample contracts: raise the notice, reply to it, and watch both sides of one record.
Take the guided tour Book a demo
Test your NEC knowledge, use the free NEC tools or download free NEC templates.
This guide is general information in our own words, not legal advice. Your contract and its Contract Data always govern. NEC, NEC3 and NEC4 are trade marks of Thomas Telford Ltd; Contract Status is not affiliated with or endorsed by NEC.