Skip to content
Book a demo

The PM Should Have Notified It: Does the Time Bar Still Apply?

No, the time bar doesn't apply to an event that arises from the Project Manager's or Supervisor's own communication. It does apply to everything else, even where the Project Manager knew all about the event.

So it depends on the event's source, not on what the Project Manager knew. That surprises many people: the 61.3 exception where the project manager should have notified an event is tied to the kinds of event 61.1 covers. A Project Manager who watches a late delivery happen has no duty under 61.1 to notify it, and your eight weeks still runs. See the NEC questions section for related problems.

Which wording do you have?

EditionThe exception covers events arising fromPractical effect
NEC4 ECC (and NEC4 subcontract, with the Contractor acting in that role)An instruction or notification, a certificate, or a changed decisionClear list. Check the event's origin against it
NEC3 ECC, April 2013 printAn instruction, a certificate, a changed decision or a corrected assumptionClear list, and "notification" isn't in it
NEC3 ECC, June 2005 printEvents the Project Manager should have notified and didn'tCloser to the question on this page, but in practice the duty it points at is the one in 61.1

Some contracts also amend this with Z clauses, and some still use older prints. Find out which yours is before writing anything, as your argument should use the right words.

Which side of the line is your event on?

EventTime bar applies?
Instruction changing the Scope, 60.1(1)No
Instruction to stop work or change a Key Date, 60.1(4)No
Instruction about an object found on Site, 60.1(7)No
Changed decision, 60.1(8)No
Search instructed and no Defect found, 60.1(10)No, as it arises from an instruction
Correction of an assumption, 60.1(17)No, under NEC3's list and as a notification under NEC4's
Late access 60.1(2), late Client item 60.1(3), Others 60.1(5)Yes, even if the Project Manager saw it happen
Missed reply 60.1(6)Yes
Physical conditions 60.1(12), weather 60.1(13), breach 60.1(18)Yes

For the full treatment, see clause 61.3 and clause 61.1. Note the outer limit in 61.7, which catches every event: under NEC3 no event is notified after the defects date, and in the NEC4 subcontract no event is notified after the Defects Certificate.

What to do now

  1. Send your notification today, whichever side of the line you think you are on. Being exempt from the bar doesn't excuse leaving things any longer.
  2. Identify the communication. Quote its reference, date and author, and say which limb of the exception it meets.
  3. If it was only spoken, say so. Under clause 13.1, a conversation is a weak basis for "an instruction", and the exception may not protect you. If you are inside eight weeks, keep inside them.
  4. Don't over-claim. If part of the effect comes from a different, time-barred cause, split it out now.

Evidence that helps

  • The instruction, certificate or decision itself, not a summary of it.
  • The earlier decision, for a changed decision: you need both to show the change.
  • The Scope clause or drawing it changed, so the change is plain.
  • Your records of when work was affected, because the dividing date for this kind of event is the date of the communication.

Sample paragraph

Our wording, fictional job. We notify this event under clause 61.3. It arises from your instruction PMI-112 dated 4 February, which changed the Scope for the car park surfacing. Clause 61.3 doesn't limit the time for notifying an event of this kind, so this notification is not out of time. Please reply under clause 61.4 and instruct quotations.

The response to expect

A Project Manager may answer that the document wasn't an instruction: "It was a design development note," or "I was only passing on the Client's comments." If so, ask what it was, under which clause it was sent, and whether you're to disregard it. Either answer helps. If it was an instruction, the exception applies. If it wasn't, you have the right to go back to the Scope, and any cost after that is on the other side of the argument.

In practice, the Project Manager's knowledge still counts for something even where the bar applies. It's relevant to any discussion of what's fair and any legal argument about waiver, and it may well shape what the Client will agree. The contract, though, doesn't make it an exception, so if you've missed the eight weeks, treat that as a separate problem. Other time limits are listed under NEC time bars.

See how this works in practice

Click through Contract Status with sample contracts: raise the notice, reply to it, and watch both sides of one record.

Take the guided tour Book a demo

Use the NEC deadline calculator, use the free NEC tools or download free NEC templates.

This guide is general information in our own words, not legal advice. Your contract and its Contract Data always govern. NEC, NEC3 and NEC4 are trade marks of Thomas Telford Ltd; Contract Status is not affiliated with or endorsed by NEC.